Are women romantics?: A Movie that Passes “The Rule”
In response to Hannah Mueller’s essay “Thinking Outside the Frame”, within a discussion of cinema as a technology of gender, she talks about a webcomic where the woman has a specific rule about watching movies. I find intriguing the idea of having this woman’s rule that you only watch movies in which more than two women are presented in non-male oriented discourse. I was trying to think of movies for which that is true. The one that came immediately to me was this really fun movie called Go Fish, by Rose Troche and Guinevere Turner (which I watched as part of a paper project for my Women and Cinema class). Indeed, a number of the movies we watched for that – all directed by females – might fit the criteria. But back to Go Fish. This movie is about a community of women, of lesbians, who live near each other, inter-date, and get together to hang out. They certainly don’t talk about men much. But I do think a good deal of the movie is them talking about other women whom they want to date. Does that pass the rule? They’re still ultimately interested in a connection with another human being. It’s just that person doesn’t happen to be male. If we consider ourselves within a patriarchy, this kind of movie (technology…) would be subverting it, and allowing female discourse. Also it brings up lesbianism/homosexuality, and openly and happily portrays people who don’t entirely fit “the norm”.
Since it does accomplish this subversion of norms and acceptance of difference (and simply because it’s a fun movie), I appreciate the movie. But what about a movie that promotes female discourse about something other than sex/dating/relationships (whether with females or males)? A movie for asexuals, perhaps? Maybe relationship movies are just more fun or interesting to many people than platonic or intellectual movies. Why is that? Is that not the case? Seeing as Go Fish is outside male-focused action/discourse, does it fit the rule? I guess the first thing that I thought of when I heard of the rule was movies where women are talking about life, their emotions, thoughts, interesting things that happen to them, intellectual discussion, the beauty of everyday events and nature, etc. By painting a portrait of women who are still focused on relationships, is this movie continuing some “norm”/gender expectation or standard for women that they will only be interested in relationships (while still accomplishing a good deal of norm-bending)? In other words, is it still upholding the women as romantics ideal?